Arjun's calculations are incorrect. The issue lies in his inputted value for P/Y and it's relationship with N.
N describes the total number of payment periods. With one "payment period" per year, N = 20 implies a 20 year timeframe, instead of the 5 we are looking for.
There are two ways Arjun could input this into his calculator:
Set N = 20, and set P/Y = 4. So N counts quarters and we find the FV after 5 years, as intended.
Set N = 5, and set P/Y = 1. So a payment period is a year. Behind the scenes, the TVM Solver finds the effective annual rate that would arise as a result of compounding quarterly with a nominal annual rate of 10%.
Both approaches are correct; just remember that whatever you choose for P/Y defines what one period means (i.e. how many there are in a year), and N must count exactly that many periods.
Generally, the first option is simpler. The key idea to remember is whenever you use a TVM solver for pure compounding, set C/Y (and P/Y) equal to the compounding frequency and make sure N = (number of years) × C/Y.